100% PASS 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR: PERFECT ISO/IEC 42001:2023ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM LEAD AUDITOR EXAM LATEST TEST DUMPS

100% Pass 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: Perfect ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Latest Test Dumps

100% Pass 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: Perfect ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Latest Test Dumps

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Test Dumps, Valid Braindumps ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Files, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification Dumps, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Formal Test, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Collection

We aim to leave no misgivings to our customers on our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice braindumps so that they are able to devote themselves fully to their studies on ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor guide materials and they will find no distraction from us. I suggest that you strike while the iron is hot since time waits for no one. with the high pass rate as 98% to 100%, you will be sure to pass your ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam and achieve your certification easily.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Preparing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
Topic 2
  • Conducting an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
  • IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.
Topic 3
  • Closing an ISO
  • IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 4
  • AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
  • IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Test Dumps <<

Valid Braindumps ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Files & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Certification Dumps

If you buy ActualPDF's PECB certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam practice questions and answers, you can not only pass PECB certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam, but also enjoy a year of free update service. If you fail your exam, ActualPDF will full refund to you. You can free download part of practice questions and answers about PECB Certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam as a try to test the reliability of ActualPDF's products.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q90-Q95):

NEW QUESTION # 90
An AI-driven recommendation system for online shopping has been accused of promoting products from certain vendors over others without clear reasoning. The company wants to address these concerns effectively. Which core element is most relevant to resolving this issue?

  • A. Accountability
  • B. Privacy and Security
  • C. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
  • D. Human-Centered Design

Answer: C

Explanation:
The concern here revolves aroundpotential algorithmic biasandpreferential treatment, which falls under the core ethical principle ofFairness and Non-Discrimination.
According to ISO/IEC 42001:2023, organizations mustidentify and mitigate discriminatory impactsof AI systems, especially where algorithmic decisions influenceuser experiences, access to services, or market fairness(Clause 6.1.2 and Clause 8.2.3).
This core element ensures that AI decisions are:
* Equitable and unbiased
* Do not systematically favor or disadvantage individuals or groups
* Transparent in rationale and decision logic
The PECB Guide emphasizes that Fairness is particularly important inrecommendation, ranking, or classification systems, where outcomes affect stakeholders' access or exposure.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (Risk Identification), Clause 8.2.3 (Controlsfor operational impact) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "AI Governance and Ethics," Subsection: Fairness and Non- Discrimination


NEW QUESTION # 91
Scenario 9:
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewing Securisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and copyright its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
During an AIMS audit at a cybersecurity company, the team found a major nonconformity - ineffective access controls for sensitive data.
Question:
Given this situation, what is the appropriate next step?

  • A. Conduct another full audit of the auditee's entire AIMS
  • B. Promptly revoke the auditee's certification without further examination
  • C. Conduct an audit follow-up before the company is recommended for certification

Answer: C

Explanation:
Major nonconformities require follow-upbefore recommending certification.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4requires that for major nonconformities:"Certification shall only be granted after verification of the effective implementation of corrective actions, typically through an on-site follow-up audit."
* Immediate revocation or full re-audit is not necessary unless systemic failure is evident.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.9.4; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 10.2.


NEW QUESTION # 92
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
What level of negligence did Emma observe regarding John's audit documentation failures?

  • A. Minor error
  • B. Gross negligence
  • C. Fraud
  • D. Ordinary negligence

Answer: D

Explanation:
Ordinary negligencerefers to a failure to apply the level of care that a reasonable auditor would exercise, without intentional misconduct.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.5 requires auditors todocument audit findings properly and completely.
* TheLead Auditor Study Guidedefines ordinary negligence as:"An auditor's unintentional oversight or failure to perform duties to expected professional standards, without evidence of deliberate wrongdoing." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 7.2.5; Lead Auditor Manual Chapter 6 ("Audit Team Behavior and Ethics").


NEW QUESTION # 93
Question:
Can ISO/IEC 42001 be integrated into an integrated management system (IMS) with ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO
9001?

  • A. Yes, because they share a similar standard structure
  • B. No, since they do not have a similar standard structure
  • C. Yes, but only under special organizational approval
  • D. No, because each management system should be implemented separately

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 follows theHigh-Level Structure (HLS)(Annex SL) used by ISO management system standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001. This structural alignment allows for easy integration into a unified management system, facilitating shared documentation, policies, audits, and continual improvement processes.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Introduction, Clause 0.3; ISO Directives Part 1, Annex SL.


NEW QUESTION # 94
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. Duringthis first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body provide all the necessary information to conduct the audit to the audit team leader?

  • A. No, information on the resources necessary to conduct the audit was not provided
  • B. Yes, all the necessary information was provided to the audit team leader
  • C. No, the audit team leader did not receive details on the audit team's training requirements

Answer: B

Explanation:
The certification body providedall the necessary information, including scope, objectives, methods, contact information, and risks.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 state that the certification body must equip the audit team leader with sufficient information for audit planning and execution.
* TheLead Auditor Study Materialconfirms:"Audit planning must be supported by complete and verified information provided by the certification body." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.


NEW QUESTION # 95
......

Our online version of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor learning guide does not restrict the use of the device. You can use the computer or you can use the mobile phone. You can choose the device you feel convenient at any time. Once you have used our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam training in a network environment, you no longer need an internet connection the next time you use it, and you can choose to use ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Training at your own right. Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam training do not limit the equipment, do not worry about the network, this will reduce you many learning obstacles, as long as you want to use ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor test guide, you can enter the learning state.

Valid Braindumps ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Files: https://www.actualpdf.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor_exam-dumps.html

Report this page